The card leads with the dates, not the photograph. Four bookable states plus the state nobody designs: what the second person sees when someone else wins the race.
Resort details on these cards are placeholders. Anything with a dashed underline is invented specificity — unit configuration, sleeps count, check-in day, amenities, times — and must be replaced with verified data before it ships. Copy quoted from the brief is used verbatim.
Exact values as used in this file.
Desktop 560px and mobile 375px, side by side.
You asked me to say if it reads as a boarding-pass trope. Honestly: at the size and radius specified it sits right on the line. The dotted rule plus two edge notches is the exact signature of an airline stub and a cinema ticket, and both of those are documents about a seat, which is the fungible thing this design is arguing it is not. It survives here for one reason — the notch is doing structural work, splitting what you get from what it costs — but it borrows a stranger's vocabulary to do it.
The alternative below keeps the split and drops the borrowed reference: the footer becomes a recessed plate. Paper-toned inset, hairline above it running full bleed to both edges, price engraved into the recess. Same structural break, deed vocabulary instead of ticket vocabulary — closer to an engraved room plate than a stub. My recommendation is B, with the perforation kept for the confirmation screen only, where a stub is genuinely the right metaphor because that page is a receipt.